Agreement Or Reliability

Another way to conduct reliability testing is through the use of the internal correlation coefficient (ICC). [12] There are several species, and one is defined as « the share of the variance of an observation due to the variability between subjects in the true scores. » [13] The CCI range can be between 0.0 and 1.0 (an early ICC definition could be between -1 and +1). CCI is high when there is little difference between the scores given by evaluators to each item, for example. B if all evaluators give each of the points the same or similar scores. The CCI is an improvement over Pearsons r {displaystyle r} and Spearmans ρ {displaystyle rho }, as it takes into account the differences in evaluation for the different segments as well as the correlation between the evaluators. As noted above, pearson correlations are the most commonly used statistics when inter-board reliability is assessed in the area of expression vocabulary (e.g.B. Bishop and Baird, 2001; Janus, 2001; Norbury et al., 2004; Bishop et al., 2006; Massa et al., 2008; Gudmundsson and Gretarsson, 2009) and this trend extends to other areas such as language disabilities (e.g. B Boynton Hauerwas and Addison Stone, 2000) or learning difficulties (for example. B Van Noord and Prevatt, 2002). As noted above, linear correlations do not provide any information on the compliance of credit ratings. They do, however, provide useful information about the relationship between two variables, here vocabulary estimates of two facilitators for the same child.

Comments are closed.